tpo28
Both of the reading and lecture are about Robert. Peary. This person was the first explorer who could arrive to the North Pole in 1909. The reading provides three reasons that Peary could do the mentioned success and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all arguments dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that for proving the aforementioned discovery, The National Geography community sent a research group to the North Pole to evaluate the validity of this story, at the end of survey; the team affirmed that Peary could reach this place. This point is challenged by the lecturer and she point out that assessment of National Geography society was unfair because this society is one of the Peary's friends and even more they funded him for this trip. She elaborates on this by mentioning that mentioned evaluation lasted just 2 days and it was not enough for gaining conclusive evidence.
Secondly, the article contends that Peary could reach the North Pole in 37 days; hence, another person who was called Tom Avery attempted to test the Peary's story. He used the same kind of dogsleds and the same number of dogs and finally, Avery arrived to the North Pole in the same number of days- 37 days- ; consequently, he believed that Peary's claim was true; in contrast, the professor expresses that Avery's stuff was less than Peary's burden because Avery's food was carried by the airplane. Furthermore, the condition of weather was different in the Peary's time and Avery did not experience the harsh weather circumstances.
Finally, the reading passage states that there are some photos which are able to prove Peary's discovery. Scholars could have measured shades. Based on the shades, researchers could determine the sun's positions in the sky which matched with the sun's positions in the North Pole. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer again and she poses that these photos belong one hundred years ago and they have taken by an old camera; subsequently, a great number of them have blurred or even the shades have fed, so the researchers could not evaluate them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'points'.
Suggestion: points
...t is challenged by the lecturer and she point out that assessment of National Geograp...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, in contrast, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9364640884 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43859388348 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530386740331 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.41384172 49.2860985944 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.642857143 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445304188821 0.272083759551 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13847624709 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936635872786 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25243019312 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892341571998 0.0443174109184 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.