TPO41
In the reading oassage, the author claims that power compnaies disapprove the carrying out the new restict regulation regarding handling the coal ash, whish a waste product of burning coal including chemical harmful components, by poiniong out three reasons f support. Howver, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts dount on what is presented inthe text and states that these rules should be conducted serously.
At first, the author argues that there are some useful environmental regulations such as applying the liner. Conversely, the lectuer brings up the idea that these rules are not adequate. For instance, the liners only are utilized for the new pond or landfill, whereas there are a plethora od old ones which cause disposal of the contaminated material seep in the soil. Therefore, having enter into the ground water, the contaminations pollutes drinking water. In order to hinder occuring and continuing these irrecovareble damage to the environment the liners have to be built in older ponds and landfills as well.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that applying strict regulations ends up to not using the recylced products of the coal ash. On the other hand, the professor dimisses this pointby clarifying the fact this assumption is basically wrong. Take a mercury as an example. This material is being recycles uder the strict regulation and all the poeple buy the product manifactured from mercury while they are awar of this fact that this material is naturally dangerious. Consequenly, the ristrct regulation has nothing to do with the further usage of its products.
Finally, the author assers that these ruls lead to a rise in the disposal and handling cost. The professor, thought, disputes this idea and subscribing the fact that despite this isue that this additonal expense is considerable, but this extra cost worth. Moreover, the increase in the electicity cost will be only 1% which is really worthwhile in comparision to have a clean environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mparision to have a clean environment.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, if, moreover, really, regarding, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22629969419 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80207110281 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 145.348785872 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605504587156 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4626129989 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.933333333 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316533531384 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870695835663 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831503182169 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171382178981 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068277411212 0.0443174109184 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 63.6247240618 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.