TPO_44: Integrated: Norse coins
The reading passage states that some archaeologists believe that the discovered coin in the state of Maine in the United States in not a genuine historical evidence for contact of Norse and Native Americans and provides three reasons of supports. However, the professor explains that many archaeologists believe that the coin is not a historical fake and is a genuine evidence of mentioned contact and she refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the article states that because of great distance from Norse settlements to place that coin was discovered, there is no connection between the coin and the settlements. In contrary, the lecturer refutes this point by stating that many other objects were found in that region which indicates that Native Americans were able to travel greatest distances and reach that places.
Second, the passage claims that no other coins have been found at Canadian sites, so Norse did not bring silver coins to North America. The professor opposes this claim and states that the Norse settlement in North America was not permanent and they came back to Europe. She says that, when they wanted to come back they packed up all coins and took them back to Europe.
Third, the reading passage holds the view that coins were not useful for the Native Americans. However the professor casts doubt this view and contends that attractive and beautiful characteristics of coins had value for them and they hold coins for their appealing value.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...re not useful for the Native Americans. However the professor casts doubt this view and...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05327868852 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50809961775 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.7185679625 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.503131107645 0.272083759551 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21164435584 0.0996497079465 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115043588284 0.0662205650399 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285041915782 0.162205337803 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648078319355 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.