Tpo45
In this set of material both of the reading and lecture discuss about old fossil structures related with Dib bees which lived as early as 200 million years ago and they are similar to modern nest. The reading provides three reasons that these nests were not created by bees; however the lecture finds all reasons dubious. The information the professor professes contradicts the fact outlined in the text.
First, the author of reading claims that there was not any bee in 200 million years ago and the earliest fossil bees are related with 100 million years ago; on the contrary the lecture expresses that there is a spatial kind of resin which is produced by tree and can save the fossil of bees. It is plausible that this kind of resin had not evolved in 200 million years ago, as a result the fossils of bees have not reminded. Just because we could not find more fossils linked with earlier time, it is not a logical argument that there was any bee in that time.
Second, the article declares that since the bees and flowers have a close relationship with each other and in there was not any flowering plant in 200 million years ago; consequently mentioned date for these fossils are not connected with bees; in contrast the professor refutes it. He believes that when the flowering plants did not existed on the earth, the bees had adapted to non-flowering plants and this close relationship has been stable forever.
Moreover, the reading passage contends that the modern nests are not similar to the found structures; conversely the lecture professes that chemical evidence which has discovered in these old structures support this similarity. There is a kind of waterproof substance that old bees used in their nest and fortunately the modern bees use it in their nests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of bees have not reminded. Just because we could not find more fossils linked wi...
^^
Line 6, column 335, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'exist'
Suggestion: exist
... that when the flowering plants did not existed on the earth, the bees had adapted to n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, first, however, moreover, second, so, in contrast, kind of, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83713355049 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41993019182 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488599348534 0.540411800872 90% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0597494776 49.2860985944 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.5 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7 21.698381199 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06452816374 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0731872205385 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033932398673 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0216372723583 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0474434912905 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248701302762 0.0443174109184 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.