zoos
The article is about benefits of zoos for animals and human beings. The professor in the lecture casts doubt on positive points made by the writer. Children’s are always fascinated for visiting various zoos.
The writer states that animals are treated well in zoos. And they live same as their forest life. The professor casts doubt by mentioning case of two red pandas. In one zoo, two Red pandas died because of rat poisoning, proving danger on safety issues of animals residing in zoos.
Secondly writer points out that zoos are no longer used for entertainment purposes nor they are marketed for the same. Instead, they are visited for education purpose. The Speaker refuses on this claim and talks that average number of animals living in zoos attract people for joy and not for learning about animals. He also talks that though some zoos are truly for education but animals are in artificial exhibits and often misunderstood by the human population.
In the third point writer mentions zoos importance in protecting endangering animal species. He gives an example of Golden lion in Africa which was saved from extinction. Professor refutes this by stating the problem of interbreeding issue in animals residing in zoos and getting birth defects. And he states that overall ratio of zoos helping to save endangering animal species is very low.
So, Zoos have got more remarkable negative reasons for animals in comparison to benefits. Some zoos are even not maintained properly by the governments and this puts danger on animals as well as visitors. In conclusion, its better if animals are allowed to live in the forest. So, they would definitely survive long.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they would definitely survive long.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, third, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07220216606 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5967697485 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570397111913 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.684422408 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.9473684211 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5789473684 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94736842105 7.06452816374 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309461289076 0.272083759551 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10597117447 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1025892633 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189812318113 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058016087375 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.