The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree?
These days, it has been a growing trend to see people wondering whether the ability of speaking multiple languages will be less essential. As such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, although I am of the opinion that the latter outdo the former.
At the outset, there is a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most conspicuous one is that by learning another popular language would open up people’s prospects in a highly important way. This is because more and more companies begin to trade internationally, thus their employees would be asked to relocate abroad or offered a promotion what requires language skills. Additionally, not only could it increase cultural awareness, but it could also prevent language barrier which has been a main issue of immigrants. Needless to say, all these upsides stand citizens in good stead when it comes to being proficient in more than one language.
Another pivotal aspect of the importance of being a multilingual speaker is that it helps to improve their brain functions and master their own language. The primary one stems from the fact that people who learn additional languages have to study grammar from scratch, thus they end up with much more depth knowledge of grammar compared to who know only one language. Last but not least, by acquiring languages with similar roots, it could help one to learn the others such as France, Spanish and so on. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of learning more than one language.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of using more than one language are too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
... depth knowledge of grammar compared to who know only one language. Last but not le...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89642857143 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60795241834 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603571428571 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8204162871 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91666666667 7.25397266985 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328184772791 0.242375264174 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108670349822 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673851366773 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185544040594 0.151781067708 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319948968991 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.