ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF CASHLESS SOCIETY.
The idea of solely relying on debit or credit card to conduct financial transaction instead of cash is widely debated, with many people claiming that the benefits it offers are no match for its drawbacks. However, I do not agree with this and I will explain in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that people can enjoy the convenience of carrying a bank card in their wallet, whether debit or credit, and pay instantly for their purchases. Not only can customers can feel save by without having to keep cash with them and manage money by keeping track of their expenses, but business can also save their time by not handing cash and stay safe by not keeping cash on their premises. Besides, if the cash is lost or stolen, it is gone. However, if the card is lost or stolen, one can call their financial institute and cancel it instantly. Many banks allow their customers to use mobile application to cancel a lost card, which virtually takes no time. Needless to say, all these merits stand people in good stead, when it comes to handing money safely, conveniently and effectively.
There are, however, some drawbacks which can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of using cards instead of money. The primary one stems from the fact that as many people use their cards, their activity can be tracked by their financial institute. So, there is always a risk of databases is getting hacked or personal financial information being stolen. Hence, it is apparent that why many are against of cashless society.
In the view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some drawbacks, the benefits of cashless society are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47291101516 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553333333333 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3065749393 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.285714286 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.25397266985 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0380612578407 0.242375264174 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0216085305576 0.0925447433944 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622415528685 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.034241178143 0.151781067708 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343501287912 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.