In recent years, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see people indulging in the usage of the private cars across the world, be it an affluent or impoverished nation. In this essay, I will elaborate the government should encourage people to use public transport instead of using private vehicles which leads to a deluge of problems such as more cars on the road, heavy traffic jam and air pollution.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons why the government should refrain from building roads to accommodate an increasing number of cars. The most conspicuous one is that pollutants from cars contribute to deteriorating the environment. Not only do they have an adverse impact on the ecology, but these also cause people to suffer from inevitable diseases; for example, pollution has reached at an alarming level in major cities of the world resulting in the prevalence of diseases increased at the all-time high.Thus, needless to say, all these demerits will have a far-reaching impact on the society and at large on the world.
Another pivotal facet of the argument is that using public transportation saves a lot of money as people do not have to buy their own cars, spend a lot of money on gas, pay for parking. For instance, an individual can save up to 70 percent of their total monthly spending by commuting through public transport. Hence, it hardly needs to mention that the associate merits of the public transport will keep an individual in a preponderant position, as far as the saving money and convenience in this raising expenses are concerned.
To recapitulate, one can conclude that the upsides of promoting the public transports by the government rather spending astronomical money behind roads are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...diseases increased at the all-time high.Thus, needless to say, all these demerits wi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, thus, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 31.9359605911 160% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9696969697 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82456465554 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589225589226 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.5024630542 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.379654695 50.4703680194 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.0 104.977214359 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.9669160288 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19492115829 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827473906536 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555886031104 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113407972967 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253598318199 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.3980295567 146% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.5123152709 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.