The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned?
The discussion on the Zoos hurts animals and should be banned, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. I believe that zoos do not hurt the animals and should not be close. The below essay will discuss all the contentions and give a suitable conclusion.
To the begin with, a variety of reasons can be offered to explain why I am not in favour of this. First and foremost, zoos provide shelter to the animals. Animals can live in a safe place which is Zoo. Secondly, animals can acquire proper protection and care from the zoos. For instance, an animal can get proper medical treatment from the doctors. Last but not the least, zoos provide healthy food to animals. Wild animals eat unhealthy food which is hazardous to their health.
If we further evaluate, there are some more aspects of this question which make my reasoning stronger. Zoos have a vital role in the entertainment world. Anyone can spend their free time and learn about the animals. Apart from this, dangerous animals can only handle by zoos. They will harm the people in absence of Zoos.
To put it in a nutshell, as I have established the viewpoints, I find only merits in this matter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 4, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ons and give a suitable conclusion. To the begin with, a variety of reasons can be offer...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, apart from, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 1207.87684729 81% => OK
No of words: 207.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71497584541 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51307115234 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628019323671 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 379.143842365 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.5024630542 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8259270994 50.4703680194 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.0 104.977214359 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.9375 20.9669160288 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 7.25397266985 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265917030686 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924177029846 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926383128469 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15393340068 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851931671515 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 12.6369458128 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 53.1260098522 143% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.9458128079 51% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.15 11.5310837438 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.32886699507 90% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 55.0591133005 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.3980295567 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.5123152709 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.