Over packaging of products has become a trend in today's competitive world. Producers are trying to attract consumers with attractive packaging of their products, not bothered about its negative impact not only on our environment but the users as well. It should be the responsibility of the producers to limit the wastage of the resources in the form of un-necessary packaging.
The cost of over packaging is actually added to the product sold. In fact, at times it is seen the packing cost and durability is more that the product itself. The type of packaging found in pharmaceutical industries can be taken as an example here. Pills and tablets are found to be packed in much bigger and colourful strips than needed. Does this increase the sale of medicine? No. Such packaging is of no concern to the consumers. But, the cost of medicine would have definitely been lesser if sold in a simple outlook.
Further, the material used is mostly non-disposable which adds to the environmental pollution to a great extent. Snacks and other food items packaged in eye-catchy shimmering coloured packets are consumed in a large scale by everybody. These packets are really difficult to dispose as they emit poisonous gas if burnt and if not can be seen to contaminate water somewhere. Producers should realize the importance of using materials like paper and stick to simple packaging.
Packaging as seen increases the cost of the product and also makes our environment unhealthy. So, this packaging boom should be checked on a serious note by the producers. Moreover, the producers should be restricted with predefined rules and parameters set by the government. It is also recommended that an awareness among the users that quality of the product is important rather than the attractive packaging.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...table has now become more controversial.The substantial influence Over packaged pro...
^^^
Line 2, column 723, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e sake of customers' benefit. From this regards, it seems logical that the cust...
^^^^
Line 2, column 801, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...e customer should make inform decisions whether or not to buy products that use over packing. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 433, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Producers
...ch add bad effects to the environmental.Producers should realize the importance of using ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 31.9359605911 182% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1207.87684729 152% => OK
No of words: 344.0 242.827586207 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34011627907 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9624346629 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566860465116 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 379.143842365 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4350329747 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.307692308 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4615384615 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442996260889 0.242375264174 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15820739514 0.0925447433944 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117389481153 0.071462118173 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295478675492 0.151781067708 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579849990026 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.