Does the advent of internet change the role of the teacher? To what extent do you agree?
Nowadays, the internet has definitely changed the ways people study. There are a lot of sources over the web through which the people study. While some people think that the role of the teachers has changed after the invention of internet and has become easier, others beleive that the role of the teachers remain the same after the advent of the internet. This essay will discuss how the role of the teachers has changed and become easier after the invention of the internet.
Firstly, the invention of the web has helped the teachers to improve their teaching methods. Initially, the resources for the teaching would be less since they had to teach the subjects only from the book knowledge. Nowadays, the teachers get a variety of the information from the internet. For example, the teachers have started to teach the students by means of the presentation from the online sources. To sum up, the invention of the internet has not only improved the teaching methods but also helped the students to learn efficiently.
Secondly, the usage of the internet has reduced the burden on the teachers. It has made possible for the teachers to simply refer to the sources over the internet. For instance, it is no longer required for a teacher to write all the information on the book into the blackboard. Hence, the introduction of the internet is a greatest advantage for the current generation teachers.
Overall, this essay discussed how the internet has guided the teachers to teach effectively, and how it has lowered their burden. In my opinion, the internet has definitely changed the role of the teachers, and this can be seen as an positive development for the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ce, the introduction of the internet is a greatest advantage for the current gene...
^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...f the teachers, and this can be seen as an positive development for the future.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91901408451 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60733433279 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454225352113 0.580463131201 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 9.0 1.56157635468 576% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4023198284 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1333333333 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244978570605 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925812035309 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075696937664 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15386182846 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743494311576 0.0609392437508 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.