Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree.
These days, there is a controversial debate between members of society about the impacts of environment pollution. There are a great number of people who interpret the responsibility of environment pollution as on individuals, while others hold an opponent view. I am inclined to believe that individuals should take part in managing the environment pollution and their role should be promoted.
There are several reasons why individuals should manage the alarming phenomenon of environment pollution. First of all, it is argued that the people who live in a society play a pivotal role in controling the amount of waste and pollution they produce, therefor it would create a feeling of accomplishment and competence among people, which consequently open avenues towards new achievements so that the individual's enthusiasm and determination would be amplified towards many daunting tasks. Take the private car usage for example, if the people do not participate in limiting their dependence on their cars no one can.
In addition, it is claimed that the governments need to gain social endorsement to be able to solve the problem of environment pollution. This is to say that the government needs to encourage the people to take an active role in the situation of the environment pollution, which would instill a strong feeling of self-esteem among citizens so that they are more likely to perform up to expectations in society. Specifically, a research study conducted by Yale University in 2015 found that the involvement of individuals in solving environment pollution would enhance their intellectual abilities to make better decisions related to social and personal life.
To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounded the view that the involvement of individuals would enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of solving environment pollution. It is expected that the institutions take cognizance of these facts and begin to adopt the methods of informing individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...es towards new achievements so that the individuals enthusiasm and determination would be a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 5.75862068966 521% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 307.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48534201954 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2455748838 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550488599349 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.4728639036 50.4703680194 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.090909091 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 20.9669160288 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169766833441 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690364359118 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416137590395 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103649440163 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407395984631 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.