. Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?

Nowadays, there is an ongoing debate among people on the investment done by the government in the art field. It can be strongly agreed that the government should not decrease the fund in the art field, while on the other hand stands a perspective that investing in the art field is just a wastage of money. This essay will further elaborate on both the sides and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are innumerable reasons why the management should invest in art. The most preponderant one stems from the fact that by investing in the field of art the nation can not only raise the awareness of their culture among foreign countries, but it can also help the nation to pass their cultural values and tradition from one generation to another. As an illustration, the research in this area invariably shows that the main factor behind preserving the cultural values and customs in India is the great investments in the field of art. For this reason, the benefit of utilising money in the sector of art should not be ignored.

Notwithstanding, some tends to believe that government should decrease their investments in arts, music and painting areas. This is because, instead of focusing on the art field the management should focus on other areas like as, healthcare, education, and public transport. For example, according to the recent survey done by the Sydney University revealed that the main reason for the fast development in the USA and Canada is fewer investments in the field of art.

In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some drawbacks, the role of investing money in the art field in preserving culture is instrumental indeed.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, thus, while, for example, in fact, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91379310345 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72267311119 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513793103448 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0331207239 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.545454545 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203732985019 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921980544472 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094931745828 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125145966276 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059740268355 0.0609392437508 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.