Nowadays, whether governments have kept their promises to develop economy in a continuous approach, and embrace it or not, has sparked a heated debate. Although, contested by many that governments should abandon making such promise, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. In my opinion, although it is not always realistic to maintain the economic growth, I am inclined to believe that it is strikingly justified and reasonable to keep the promise of prosperity as a result of its positive social and financial effects.
To begin with, globalization has resulted in close relations between each country’s economic status as the world becomes an integrated system. With this promise of continuous economic growth, it gives the positive national image to the world, which further encourages local and international businesses. For instance, the reports from Chinese Ministry of Economic Affairs has shown a continuous 6% growth as a result of making similar economic promise in the beginning of this century. Thus, the promise of prospective economic growth is an indicator for the market and is achievable by making corresponding development strategies and legislation.
Furthermore, industries rely on government’s promise to make its corresponding economic plan. A study by the Economic has revealed that 70% of the industry increase its funding in careers and development sector after government made similar policies on economic growth. Thus, such promise increases employment opportunities and brings positive impacts on the economy.
In conclusion, it is virtual for governments to make promise on continuous economy growth to enhance a positive national image to its citizens and people around the world, which further encourages business development and stabilizes the society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70967741935 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20318632233 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551971326165 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1823550434 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.818181818 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286868154809 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11576440656 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416148294476 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175620441521 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201695472721 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.