Law can change human behaviour
These days, it has been a growing trend to see governments using laws to control human behaviour. As such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, although I am of the opinion that the former outdo the latter.
There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most conspicuous one is that countries with the strict laws have a minimal crime rate. For example, in Singapore, criminals who commit a criminal offence such as smuggling drugs must face a death penalty. Therefore, this law is not only creating a sense of fear among people of getting punished but also preventing the similar crime happening in the future. Needless to say, all these upsides stand the citizens in good stead when it comes to controlling how people behave by using rules and regulation.
Another pivotal aspect of using laws to change human behaviour is that the absence of laws would result in an unsafe society. The primary one stems from the fact that traffic laws in some countries are not strict enough to be followed and it leads to a high number of road traffic deaths. Last but not least, cyber crime has become a grave issue in these days, which already has some regulations in place, but these are not followed by the people. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of using laws to change human behaviour.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of using laws to change how human behave are too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...former outdo the latter. There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. Th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, therefore, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64750957854 5.00649968141 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34965571096 2.71678728327 86% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8939213993 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.083333333 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364492760474 0.242375264174 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128449374156 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155853449173 0.071462118173 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21394605514 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111492529168 0.0609392437508 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.5310837438 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.