Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
These days, it has been a growing trend to see many corporations involving their employees in decision making policy. As such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, although I am of the opinion that the former outdo the latter.
There is a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most conspicuous one is that engaging workers in making decisions would motivate them to work more efficiently. This is because by allowing staff members to be a part of the decision-making process gives them a sense of being an indispensable part of the company. Furthermore, not only could the method provide them greater incentives, but it could also bring out their inside hidden talent for benefit of the company. Needless to say, all these upsides stand the companies in good stead when it comes to loyal and high-productivity employees.
However, there are some pitfalls that can overwhelm the potential benefits of involving workforce in decision making policy. The primary one stems from the fact that this approach might put the company in danger of confidential information leaks. For instance, there are numerous cases in which companies were on the verge of being bankrupt because their essential info was spread to their rivals. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the involvement of staff members in making a decision.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite the drawbacks, the benefits of involvement of employees in a decision-making process are too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07936507937 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88520172863 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5295849228 50.4703680194 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236808347143 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080727805959 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683051889558 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140869538077 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031734930071 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.