Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, the degree of employees’ engagement in decision making has become a heated debate the world over. Although contested by many, noticeable numbers of people hold true the notion that employees should be involved for the sake of better progression of the firm. I opt to vigorously support this idea as it can be quite advantageous. This will be shown in this essay.
For one, employees can provide valuable information to key decision makers of a company which ultimately lead to a more precise evaluation of problems they encountered with. Take Toyota for example. In this automotive giant during decision making processes regarding plant layouts and manufacturing techniques, every single personnel’s opinion is highly appreciated by the management. This example illustrates how staff engagements may contribute to better judgements and consequently more rational decisions as Toyota is a leading car-producing company. Thus, it is quite clear that why the idea of employees’ involvement in a company decision making policy has garnered support.
In addition to this, it is argued that the degree of personnel’s participation in decision making processes positively correlates with the number of creative ideas they propose and consequently can act as a catalyst for higher motivations. From my own experience, as the manager of department, I can feel how my subordinate colleagues provide me with smart interesting solutions when they involve in the decision making process compared to the times they do not. Hence, it is quite evident how this idea is considered beneficial.
To conclude, after analyzing how more precise evaluation of the situation as well as higher levels of employees’ motivation can be achieved by their involvement in decision making, it has been proven that this brings with it more benefits than drawback to the progression of the firm.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, may, regarding, so, thus, well, as to, for example, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43288590604 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26619031736 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557046979866 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.3499206073 50.4703680194 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.538461538 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194165955246 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732605851126 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531091477483 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121853878664 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382879177471 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.