"Mistakes, obviously, show us what needs improvement. Without mistakes, how would we know what we had to work on?"
Are mistakes the portals of discovery or progress?
State your opinion and support it with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
Many people are of the view that mistakes are progressive, while others believe that mistakes are discovered. In this essay, I will discuss the reason due to which I am inclined to believe that mistakes are in-fact portal of progress.
From an educational perspective, mistakes can lead to astonishing results. When a person makes a mistake, he often tends to see the reasons behind his mistake, which results in increasing his knowledge. For instance, when I was in university, I made a-lot of mistake during engineering prototype design and my professor corrected me always. If it weren't for those mistakes, I would have never gained the true knowledge of design a prototype. Hence, mistakes tells a person that he needs to focus more which in turn increases his learning.
On the other hand, mistakes can motivate an individual. For motivation and dedication, a person needs to identify the areas where he needs to put more effort, and this can only be achieved by making mistakes. For example, a captain of a football team can only realise the true potential of the team players by making some mistakes in team arrangement. Therefore, mistakes can only lead us forward not backward.
In conclusion, mistakes can help an individual to get better results in education and mistakes can enhance person's leadership skills. In my opinion, mistakes in their true essence is progress which can't be achieved in any other way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...pe design and my professor corrected me always. If it werent for those mistakes, I wou...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...my professor corrected me always. If it werent for those mistakes, I would have never ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...in their true essence is progress which cant be achieved in any other way.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03375527426 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81191894285 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3174525479 50.4703680194 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7692307692 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115845701489 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473054416985 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0222611517663 0.071462118173 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757146748668 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00920996871873 0.0609392437508 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.