Paper books are and will always be superior to e-books.
Discuss the advantages or disadvantages of e-books with regards to this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
In this modern world, printed books are still popular than e-books. Currently, the idea that e-books aren't superior to paper books has sparked a global debate. Although e-books has proven to be consistently benefical in terms of availability, numerous people still maintain opposing views. In this essay, I will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of e-books in regard to superiority.
First, based on current research the adverse effects of e-books can be easily recognized. When considering e-books factors such as strain on eyes, eye dryness and eye sight are quite evident. According to recent study by my university, it has been found that students who prefer to read paper books over e-books do not suffer from eye irritation. Thus, the superiority of paper books is further emphasized by the cumulative disadvantage that results from e-books.
On the other hand, e-books have made it possible for everyone to read books and has provided poor people with opportunity to avail cheaper options. Cheap e-books are considered as a reliable source of information for many people. For instance, due to e-books my classmates were able to graduate from school. Hence, it is plausible to perceive that e-books are essential for our society to excel.
To conclude, although e-books provide the opportunity for poor people to read, paper books will always be dominant. Thus, I profoundly believe that paper books are more beneficial as it significantly outweighs the benefits and drawbacks of e-books.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...books. Currently, the idea that e-books arent superior to paper books has sparked a g...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesight'.
Suggestion: eyesight
...such as strain on eyes, eye dryness and eye sight are quite evident. According to recent ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, so, still, thus, for instance, such as, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30543933054 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76290062427 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594142259414 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9466682223 50.4703680194 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.5714285714 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0714285714 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329169661398 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127097902478 0.0925447433944 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602186058404 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212284022653 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406565972113 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.