Positive And Negative Effects Of Technology Information Through Mass Media

Essay topics:

Positive And Negative Effects Of Technology Information Through Mass Media

The importance of technology information through mass media which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while4 others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate on both the positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

There is the myriad reason which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that technology is the best option for human life and many people use this technology, For example, smartphone a very important role in human life, this technology very easily uses any person. Needless to say, all these merits stand in good stead.

However, there are pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming ones is that technology information through mass media. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.

In conclusion, according to the argument aforementioned above one can reach a conclusion that the benefits technology used for human life is an instrument indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'benefits'' or 'benefit's'?
Suggestion: benefits'; benefit's
...ove one can reach a conclusion that the benefits technology used for human life is an in...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35159817352 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79571407347 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.4294100438 50.4703680194 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.2 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230976391176 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758766221399 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103334559537 0.071462118173 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138542630318 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972454949023 0.0609392437508 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.