School should prepare students for the university rather than work. How far do you agree with this statement?
Schools are the stepping stones for people to build their fundamentals and basics of numeracy and literacy. I believe that schools play a crucial role in preparing students for universities. Therefore, I agree that schools should prepare students for the university rather than work because schools introduce students to critical basic skills and instill important values.
Critical skills, especially in both literacy and numeracy which are required for work cannot be learned in one day. Therefore, schools have a role to play in ensuring that students learn these essential skills that will enable them to complete various tasks. When students have grasped these basic concepts, they can then proceed to specialize in their interests in universities, which will prepare them for work.
Apart from the essential skills that are required, values are also a very important aspect to consider, as values define a person. If a student is prepared for work instead of universities, more emphasis may be placed on having the required skills rather than teaching them about important values. This approach may cause students to have less creativity in their minds, and may also cause everybody to be the same.
Although some people argue that schools should introduce working aspects as it will prepare the students for their future better, I can only agree to a certain extent. Introducing students to the concept of working is sufficient, and schools should not go further than that. Based on the reasons above, I strongly believe that schools should prepare students for universities rather than work.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30980392157 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60873049918 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513725490196 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6951166964 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.833333333 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390363747001 0.242375264174 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172728038391 0.0925447433944 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131148575014 0.071462118173 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267219449382 0.151781067708 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134895793149 0.0609392437508 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.