Should Age discrimination against older workers be made illegal?
Age has never been an indicator of the potential possessed by an individual. Discriminating older workforce for their age ignoring the skills they possess is unreasonable and unjust. It is violation of the basic right of equality, endorsed by all the democracies of the world.
While, organizations have all the rights to hire or fire an employee, this should only be based on merit. There is nothing to prove that older workers are less productive compared to their younger counterparts. If an older worker is unable to meet the challenging work requirements due to age, it directly makes him unfit for the position. In such cases, organization could look for a younger or more suitable replacement rather than determining the ability of the individual just by his age. Furthermore, practicing age discrimination at workplace will bring down the morale of entire workforce making them less faithful towards the employer.
On the contrary, mixed workforce can prove to be a boon to an institution. Old and young employees can complement each other and provide a competitive edge to the organization. For instance, Older workers, who are relatively more experienced, can mentor young employees while learning cutting edge technologies at the same time from them.
In conclusion, organization will benefit from older employees who will help it flourish even more. In order to protect individual’s rights and maintain a healthy work environment, I am of the opinion that age discrimination at workforce should be made illegal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cut'.
Suggestion: to cut
...n mentor young employees while learning cutting edge technologies at the same time from...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'flourishes'?
Suggestion: flourishes
...t from older employees who will help it flourish even more. In order to protect individu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2868852459 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22658393029 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631147540984 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.325123152709 308% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3151103768 50.4703680194 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2307692308 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265029328319 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845163595516 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067500542462 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15493247584 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712117467243 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.