Recently, the phenomenon of academic subjects has sparked a heated debate. Although, some conjecture that subjects such as chemistry, physics and history should be taught in schools, while on the contrary, some curtails that practical knowledge is vital as compared to theoretical studies. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I would like to put forward my perspectives focusing on the advantages and disadvantages of practical and theoretical knowledge.
Firstly, considering my personal experience, both type of subjects plays a salient role in cognitive brain development skills. while practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking creates a long-lasting impression on children's minds, on the flip of the coin, subjects such as physics, chemistry put forward a real in-depth knowledge and elaborate on what has happened in the past these subjects are keeping the real aesthetics of our traditional teaching practices. At any point of time we should not shun such type of teaching practices.
Secondly, practical and theoretical knowledge has its own set of advantages. Practical knowledge, keeps children engages in both physical and mental activities and it turn alleviate their overall skills, children fascinate doing practical stuff. Theoretical knowledge on the contrast flourish our minds with all set of events which had happened in the past. Some of the negative sparse of the theoretical subjects would be that sometime students lacks their interest in studying a lengthy subject, leading them to not focus on these studies. Additional, children are like a mold, who can gain knowledge in any path.
To encapsulate, I would like to conclude that both types of subjects has their own merits and ramifications, but in my opinion, people should welcome studies of both subjects with wide arm open.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... in cognitive brain development skills. while practical subjects, such as motor mecha...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'turns'?
Suggestion: turns
...h physical and mental activities and it turn alleviate their overall skills, childre...
^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... events which had happened in the past. Some of the negative sparse of the theoretical subj...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48754448399 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00365148024 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565836298932 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.2961027478 50.4703680194 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254541824131 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838175306976 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875665330146 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154103721229 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682450675227 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.