Some people believe that to be a successful sportsperson, one needs to have a natural ability. Others think that hard work and practice are more important.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
In today's era, people are very passionate about becoming sports players or seeing sports as a better career option. However, some opine that one should have certain inherent skills to a good sportsperson, while others are against it. Hence, I am going to shed some light on both the views of this statement.
To begin with, it is undeniable that only a few people become an extraordinary player and they excel in sports on account of manifold reasons. Firstly, genetic and inherent skills play a vital role in becoming excellent in all such realms which include sports as well, as it develops a unique talent in the people. On top of that, there are various things, which cannot be taught to someone by any mean, but some people show such tendency whereby they comprehend things easily and become master in it, and it becomes possible owing to natural capacity and ability.
On the other hand, people can become a great sportsperson by their hard work and tenacity due to multifarious reasons. Firstly, dedication and zeal are the two key factors, which help people to develop a stronghold in any field, which is similar in sports. In addition, people with proper training and guidance can easily become a sports person, and here natural ability does not hold any value. For instance, it has been many times that people have become a good sports person without having any sports-related background, by their hard work and passion.
In conclusion, I opine that nothing is impossible in this world, one just need to work hard for it, whether it comes to become a sportsperson or anything else.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 332, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...aining and guidance can easily become a sports person, and here natural ability does n...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90842490842 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54929791973 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600732600733 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1865201141 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.818181818 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4545454545 7.25397266985 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202529717837 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822093388612 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551536712881 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12941140859 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358142689607 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.