Some people believe that building unattractive houses should be prohibited because they are exposed to the public. What is your opinion about this?

Essay topics:

Some people believe that building unattractive houses should be prohibited because they are exposed to the public. What is your opinion about this?

Few individuals suggest that constructing unappealing houses should not be allowed because they are displayed to the public. To my mind, I oppose to the foregoing argument due to limited budget and the excersing right to have a house of their choice.

To begin with, people have different levels of economic status. One cannot force others to have something they cannot afford. Having an own home is a blessing in itself because it is an essential need to human. However, poor individuals cannot buy expensive construction materials as wealthy people does. Financial concern limits them to build a house which is aesthetically pleasing to look at. For example, squatter areas is plenty beside beautiful abode for the reason that it is the shelter they can only provide to their families.

In addition, everbody has their own right to build their shelter. People would firstly buy a land to erect their house and eventually use their most capable resources to build their home. Legally speaking, it their prejudice to design and remodel their houses regardless of what other socialite people may think of them. To illustrate this, in Thailand, thousand shelters were constructed by the communities themselves without consideration to engineering design and architecture.

To sum up, building of houses without aesthetic features can be permitted for the reason that not all people have the capacity to build intricate houses as well as they have the legal right to construct their home to whatever purpose or design. Indeed, housing is a fundamental needs of men that should not be compromised.

Votes
Average: 6.3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...cern limits them to build a house which is aesthetically pleasing to look at. For example, squatter areas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... them. To illustrate this, in Thailand, thousand shelters were constructed by the commun...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, may, so, well, for example, in addition, as well as, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18918918919 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77587113581 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602316602317 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2192562761 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217438090372 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780389983128 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627362646889 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148197259592 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476893879387 0.0609392437508 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.