Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give
your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of free public transportation and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of making transportation free is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that commuting without any charge can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, providing free transportation system can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of decreasing air pollution as well as traffic congestion, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that subsiding subways attracts people to use it. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both traffic strategies and expanding bus services apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, charging individuals might increase the consequences of a decline in using trains. Moreover, fundamental aspects of private cars could relate to this reality that the demerits of the risk of accident pertain to fatalities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of traffic free-zone is correlated negatively with emission greenhouse gases. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of public safety.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the pros of free public transportation far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of transportation development prove the significance of commuting regulations, but also pinpoint saving money and time.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68029739777 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3162310076 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665427509294 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.103371171 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192001282137 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603680955328 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482393892079 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107996036235 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365278347536 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.