Women now compete and cooperate with men in almost all walks of life and they have proved their mettle, too. However, men and women are not built alike. They may have the same intellectual capabilities, but physically and emotionally men and women are different and that probably explains why certain jobs are considered suitable for men and certain other jobs suitable for women.
Until a few decades ago many people used to believe that women are not suitable for a career in science or finance. Such wrong notions no longer exist because many women have proved that they make equally brilliant engineers and number crunchers. Still, certain sectors prefer men over women. There are also some sectors where women outperform men.
Thanks to their stronger physique, men are more suitable for physically demanding jobs than women. For example, jobs in mining and mechanics are laborious and involve handling heavy machinery. A few women have proved that they are capable of handling such jobs, but the majority of workers employed in these sectors are men. The armed forces also recruit more men than women.
Several women have proved that they are capable of doing just about anything that men can. Take for instance, the case of Madam Curie, the first woman to win the Nobel Prize for Physics. She proved her mettle at a time when science and technology were largely dominated by men. Women have also conquered the seas, the mountains and the skies. The fact that they lacked muscle power didn’t deter them from pursuing their goals. Still, these are exceptions rather than the rules.
In conclusion, though I certainly believe gender equality in the workforce but few jobs areas are such where a particular gender can excel and outperformed their counterparts. So I think there is no harm in it because it will be a win win situation for everyone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 232, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: win
...e is no harm in it because it will be a win win situation for everyone.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 312.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98717948718 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40506806551 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6551724138 150% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2366507451 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8947368421 104.977214359 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4210526316 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 2.91625615764 343% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256777056322 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863575987667 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680303809529 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147535898977 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531374881311 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.