These days, we are seeing an increasing amount of violence on television, and this is having a negative impact on children's behaviour.
Do you agree or disagree?
Television is one of the most significant forms of media, which in turn plays a vital role in disseminating valuable information as well as making people more aware. However, some are of the view that more violent and disturbing content on the television has a deeper impact on children. Here, I completely concur with the statement.
To commence with, human has made television as an essential part of their life, but needless to say that violence on the television is utterly erroneous for the children owing to a plethora of reasons. Firstly, children are of tender age, where they grasp things rapidly which in turn leaves a deep imprint on their minds, thereby it categorically indicates that by watching violent programs, children may develop aggressive and erratic behavior, which is not favorable for them. On top of that, children remain in a habit of imitating things, therefore whenever they watch such content on television then it is likely possible that they can even distract and spoil their life by imitating violent content.
Meanwhile, when children see anything practically or in visual then they quickly comprehend such things, and here television constitutes a common platform for such things. For instance, it has been seen that nowadays children become stubborn and have demand of nonsensical things, which are not pertinent in such age, and it is due to the influence of such negative content, which is shown on television. In addition, violent content is presented in such a fancy way that children consider such a way as a great avenue for success and fame, because of their inability to gauge things.
In conclusion, I opine that television can also become a valuable source of knowledge for children, and for that parents should have proper monitoring on the content which their children watch on the television.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 5.94088669951 269% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18936877076 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77828675177 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548172757475 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.9219993106 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.2 104.977214359 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1 20.9669160288 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.7 7.25397266985 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105981709021 0.242375264174 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472683683459 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035112030841 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0701907445304 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225151389552 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.