The time people devote in job leaves very little for personal life How widespread is the problem What problem will this shortage of time cause

Essay topics:

The time people devote in job leaves very little for personal life. How widespread is the problem? What problem will this shortage of time cause?

Recently, devoting time in job has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "is it advantageous or not?". Whereas it is a widely held view that little time left for personal life is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the psychological standpoint, personal life is bound up inextricably with part-time employment, which indicates they lead to household incomes. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between the family income and gathering families. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of working hours is correlated positively with private life.
Within the realm of sociology, without the slightest doubt, full-time employees attribute to professional life, in that it would come down to family income. A salient example of such attribution is the annual salary, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take time spending with families for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint social problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of spending time in job.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of devoting time in job are of more significance.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51948051948 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14011901761 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69696969697 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0910545451 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269259872478 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944356592898 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681342927497 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153044545168 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061878224428 0.0609392437508 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.