The time people devote in jobs leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem? What problem will this shortage of time cause?
Recently devoting a lot of time in jobs by people has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question " What problem will this shortage of time cause?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that having a little time for personal life is a widespread problem. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economic standpoint, career prosperities is bound up inextricably with overtime work, which indicates they lead to both sufficient income and incentives. As a well-known example, a study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between bones and extra work as well as an exponential increase in additional profits. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of financial rewards is correlated positively with not only a lucrative job but also responsibilities.
Within the realm of personal life, without the slightest doubt, social life problems attribute to working unsocial hours, in that it would come down to anxiety, stress, and insufficient time. A salient example of such attribution is family problems, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take children's' misbehavior for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint physical activities problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to emotional bonds, psychological disorders, and even communication problems. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of dedicating time for family and leisure.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I believe that time devoted in jobs is a widespread problem which has immense consequences. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1795946632 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4386911214 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371216586965 0.242375264174 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106816578765 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13863432495 0.071462118173 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224174989226 0.151781067708 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198321780855 0.0609392437508 325% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.