Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, is one of the most widely-used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long term health costs are high - for smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity.
Do governments have a legitimate role to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to the individual?
It is widely an issue today that tobacco is one of the primary and wide-spread drug that people are using globally. More than a billion of the populace are legally smoking on a daily basis. There is a long period of effect in terms of health which is on high risk for the users themselves as well as the welfare of the surrounding community. I firmly believe that the government should have a legitimate role to legislate laws in protecting its citizens. These are due to preservation of life and the right to live in a healthy environment.
To begin with, each nation has to imbibe the quality of life to be enjoyed by its people. They should promulgate several rules and regulations regarding the use of tobacco to prolong the life of every individual and increase their chance to live normally, free from pollution and hazardous chemicals around them. To illustrate this, their are some countries who are after the banning of the use of cigarettes in public places. This would immediately improve the condition of those who are non-smokers. `
Furthermore, looking into general perspective, the government should let its people sustain their wonderful life living on earth. As these cigarettes is harmful to one's health, they could possibly have certain diseases like lung cancer which paralyzes their capability to work for their families and worse as death. Even though, addiction to such drug is also the problem, this must have to stop at some point in life.
In conclusion, the general public should insist on the changes regarding the laws and statutory protecting their lives most especially with the use of tobacco. Citizen need to call for action about this by maintaining a healthy lifestyle and following the ordinances approved by the administration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...micals around them. To illustrate this, their are some countries who are after the ba...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ediately improve the condition of those who are non-smokers. ' Furthermore, loo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...arth. As these cigarettes is harmful to ones health, they could possibly have certai...
^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...arettes is harmful to ones health, they could possibly have certain diseases like lung cancer ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ty to work for their families and worse as death. Even though, addiction to such d...
^^
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e point in life. In conclusion, the general public should insist on the changes regarding ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly with the use of tobacco. Citizen need to call for action about this by maintai...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, well, as to, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 31.9359605911 160% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01351351351 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76426507985 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7230910472 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183001482566 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561741997335 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615134664269 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111561361252 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751939357824 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 77.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.