There is no escape from the fact that tourism might have some negative aspects in underdeveloped countries. However, in my opinion, it is necessary for these countries to invest in tourism industry, so their developement speed would accelerate.
From one hand, some people believe that holyday-makers from other nations might endanger the local country's sets of culture. Visitors from other nationalities, coming from a whole different society, are willing to pose their own beliefs to the host country's people. For example, public hugging, which might not be acceptable by eastern people, might seem a disrespect in the eyes of eastern people. Such issues might raise some concerns, and also may be seen as a thread to a nation's long standing ethics.
On the other hand, tourism has a myriad of financial advantages for a country. Local people in underdeveloped societies can take advantage of the business market to sell their handcrafts and domestic products like traditional foods. Moreover, this phenomenon would lead to cultural diversity of a nation which is beneficial for economic purposes.
In conclusion, while accepting the drawbacks of enhancement of tourist industry, I still believe that if approached properly, it can be an upward step toward helping underdeveloped countries to become more rich and affluent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 474, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...ns, and also may be seen as a thread to a nations long standing ethics. On the other han...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 208.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39903846154 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99194168589 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653846153846 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9081291859 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.3 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 7.25397266985 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119955780781 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481535258656 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417090005095 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816124323474 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414807276157 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.