While artificial intelligence becomes so advanced, people can use computers to translate foreign languages. Do you agree with it? Use examples or your experiences.
Recently the phenomenon of using advanced artificial intelligence to translate foreign languages and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of agreeing to translate foreign languages are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that advanced artificial intelligence can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, using artificial intelligence by people can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of efficient artificial intelligence, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of using modern computers. Thus, beneficial ramifications of accurate translating foreign languages are visible.
From a scientific point of view, using computers to translate foreign languages by people can provide the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of using outdated computers to translate foreign languages are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described useless artificial intelligence. Hence, predicted outcomes of abused artificial intelligence by people are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of used advanced artificial intelligence to translate foreign languages far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of translated foreign languages prove the significance of advanced artificial intelligence, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10980392157 5.00649968141 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35839712047 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.57093596059 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3314836385 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.636363636 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496286171793 0.242375264174 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175172173159 0.0925447433944 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944565793218 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303752746762 0.151781067708 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342612614081 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 14.29 53.1260098522 27% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.9458128079 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.45 11.5310837438 160% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.5123152709 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.