World is becoming forest of buildings and it is becoming difficult to find trees everywhere. Eradicate Global Warming.
Recently the phenomenon of global warming and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many the matter of complex ways to eradicate this is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the practices to increase greenery as planting trees can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, modern life can offer the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that both crucial issues and final outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the current policies. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both the common phenomenon and accordingly complicated rules apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of public arena, the constructing building might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To recapitulate, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that greenery on planet should be focused, as its benefits far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages prove the significance of this unique phenomenon but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 296, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...orrelated negatively with vital issues. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65560165975 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20183570218 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676348547718 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3588633231 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.909090909 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.037458664824 0.242375264174 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0137424491808 0.0925447433944 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0184174930883 0.071462118173 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.021346495573 0.151781067708 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254415701667 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.