Is experiential learning (learning by doing) a better approach as compared to formal education? Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there are so many learning methods. Two of them are more common than others which are experiential learning and formal learning. This essay will discuss which one is more efficient.
Learning styles have been the most prevalent topic for many researchers for a long time. The biggest question obviously is whether experiential learning or traditional education is more effective. It changes according to one’s learning method and both are efficient for the right person. However, most of the studies in this field showed that experiential learning is a faster and more practical than traditional method. For example when a student make an experiment to learn something, he/she does not just learn theoretical information about the subject but experience the other aspects of this subjects with all of the senses. Maybe with this experiment, the student can attach variable subjects with each other. In the other way, the major part of traditional learning is usually to read theoretical information and experiments from texts. Although this is not a bad opportunity, it should be considered if the other choice is more productive and faster or maybe even more sustainable and on that basis it should be decided which learning approach is better.
In conclusion, this essay has emphasized that the learning method is a very personal and variable part of academic life. Learning approach should be chosen wisely and carefully but ın my opinion experiential learning is more productive by time and energy than the traditional method.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ect but experience the other aspects of this subjects with all of the senses. Maybe ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...the other aspects of this subjects with all of the senses. Maybe with this experiment, the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...energy than the traditional method.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 31.9359605911 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32520325203 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83724695009 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552845528455 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8020872702 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.769230769 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 2.91625615764 274% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235928037428 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993057600635 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590255382877 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179107020316 0.151781067708 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016434199521 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.