Entegrated writing-TPO16

Essay topics:

Entegrated writing-TPO16

The reading passage discusses about the studies’ limitation on the old culture artifacts of the United Kingdom and holds forth three reasons. However, the lecture refutes those reasons by explaining the advantages of the new guidelines of archaeology in 1990.

First, the reading passage describes that with the growth population of Britain, most of the precious artifacts remain uncovered. While professor rejects it by mentioning that based on the new guidelines, the companies before the construction, should examine the sites, so that if there are the historic values, archaeologists with the corporation of those companies should built and plan to preserve the site.

Second, based on the reading, the financial supports behalf of the government are decreased and they are not adequate for doing research on historic sides. On contrary, the lecture explains that archeologists should be paid by the construction companies rather than the government. In this case, the financial supports will be more to preserve the sites rather than before.

Finlay, the reading mentions that careers of the archeologist are limited. While professor rejects it and adds that under the new guideline, experts have vast variety of jobs such as examination site, preservation, researches, and process data for writing reports. Therefore, the work positions of the archeologists are increased.

Votes
Average: 8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Sentence: While professor rejects it by mentioning that based on the new guidelines, the companies before the construction, should examine the sites, so that if there are the historic values, archaeologists with the corporation of those companies should built and plan to preserve the site.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to should and built

Sentence: However, the lecture refutes those reasons by explaining the advantages of the new guidelines of archaeology in 1990.
Error: archaeology Suggestion: archeology

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 10 12
No. of Words: 211 250
No. of Characters: 1137 1200
No. of Different Words: 120 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.811 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.389 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.844 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 89 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 75 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.1 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.492 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.384 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.645 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.045 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4