how to increase your knowledge of English slang and idioms

Essay topics:

how to increase your knowledge of English slang and idioms

Nowadays, the way to enrich people’s knowledge of English slang and idioms is so necessary. First of all, the internet should be used to upgrade the knowledge of English slang and idioms. If learners choose this method, they can listen to music and watch movies in English. The more English songs and movie people listen, the more effectively learners’ knowledge of English slang and idioms is improved. The first time might be difficult, but people shouldn’t be bored and disappointed. Besides, if learners do not like learning English slang and idioms by watching English movies or listening to English songs, they can follow native speaker accounts on the social media such as Facebook, Instagram, youtube,... This method seems effective since learners will interact with others who speak and use English fluently. People can message slang and idioms that they do not understand to native speakers. After that learners will be explained clearly and thoroughly by them. Secondly, as well as finally, studying English slang and idioms by reading books is believed to be a wonderful idea to enlarge English slang and idioms. English books have an abundant quantity about slang and idioms so English books can be read frequently. Should learners feel bored in reading English books, they should shift books genre to increase reading book’s interesting. In short, there are two methods to be good at English slang and idioms: using the internet and reading books

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-08-17 trangtrang16 56 view
Essays by user trangtrang16 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 710, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...dia such as Facebook, Instagram, youtube,... This method seems effective since lea...
^^
Line 1, column 1462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms: using the internet and reading books
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, in short, such as, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21518987342 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53388789585 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540084388186 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1132478049 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0769230769 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 5.23603664747 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348870356654 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151330297904 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104024555175 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.348870356654 0.15604864568 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.