The bar chart below shows the percentage participation of men in senior development in three companies between 1980 and the year 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant

This bar graph illustrates the percentage of males indulging in senior development in three companies from 1980 to 2010. The following essay examines the trends briefly explain masculine involvement in the given field.

In the overview, the participation of men in the given field corresponding to IBM has been exponentially increasing. whereas that of Microsoft rose gradually till 2000 and suddenly raced high at the end. Apple has shown fluctuating and comparatively low progress in this regard.

Parsing the hike patterns of individual companies, IBM experienced poor masculine enrollment from 1980 to 1985 but later picked up drastically and almost doubled from 30 to about 60 percent between 2000 to 2010, being the highest among the three companies. Microsoft, on the other hand, has seen mild step-up in this sector over the years 1980 to 2000 but took an enormous leap of almost 20 percent in the final decade. while apple with respect to this issue dominated the rest at the start and fell low during 1980 to 1990 but later picked up a little bit eventually ending as the least of all.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
... IBM has been exponentially increasing. whereas that of Microsoft rose gradually till 2...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... almost 20 percent in the final decade. while apple with respect to this issue domina...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ring 1980 to 1990 but later picked up a little bit eventually ending as the least of all. ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, so, whereas, while, with respect to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03278688525 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7737179565 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650273224044 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0329144343 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143444672047 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060723334122 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869495060672 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103662817562 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676903937525 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.