The given first pie chart gives information about typical Australian household energy usages while the second pie chart presents the rate of greenhouse gas emissions caused by Australian household, which lead to environmental problems.

The given first pie chart provides information about typical Australian household energy usages while the second pie chart presents the rate of CO2 emission caused by Australian households that came from the consequence of energy consumption.

In general, Australians in each family tend to utilise the heating systems with the great deal proportion and these release greenhouse gas significantly.

As for the use of energy for heating, heating comprised of 42% but, this emitted just less half of CO2 emissions while using of water heating was nearly a third which was the similar amount of co2 emissions. In contrast, cooling was spent only 2% which was the lowest and only was released just 3% of green gas.

When it comes to other energy usages, the reminded total amount of energy consumptions consisted of 26% but the entire rate of CO2 emissions comprised of double the amount.

Overall, it can be seen that the heating system in Australian seems to be impractical regarding energy usages, and such power contributes to environmental problems and climate change potentials.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, third, while, as for, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26857142857 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7783183873 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634285714286 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.7369028015 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.666666667 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 5.23603664747 255% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37898214728 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171501655989 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.233481883697 0.0843802449381 277% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199200407489 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.246687609867 0.0819641961636 301% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.