Grandparents take care of children when their parents are out of work what are the advantages and possible disadvantages of this

In this contemporary era, it is quite common that both parents are employed and leave to work daily. In this situation, they barely find time to spend with their kids because of which arises a need for grandparents to be the child's guardians. This essay closely examines both positives and negatives and in furtherance declares whether this is beneficial or not.

Firstly, let us put a light on the positives. When it comes to nurturing little ones, no one can be better than grandparents who possess vast experience and have already done parenting earlier. They help adolescents in comprehending good and differentiating it from the contrary besides developing moral attributes. Moreover, parents generally get irritated by some misdoings of the kids but the elders embrace extensive patience and handle them with the utmost care. Thus, old people can effectively look after the under-aged.

Now, hurtling towards the drawbacks of this situation there are scarcely few of them. One thing that bothers them is their physical restraint, due to this they cannot accompany the child while playing outdoor games. For example, sometimes it takes a lot of physical work in controlling 10-year old kids as they will be running and jumping all around the house.

Considering the above-cited information, it is obvious that the advantages overshadow the drawbacks. So, it can be concluded that grandparents taking care of children will be beneficial to a large extent.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (3 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, so, thus, while, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 5.60731707317 464% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25106382979 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92138119476 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 106.607317073 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672340425532 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1234674306 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9230769231 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241288105535 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676263876665 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485242020699 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132769086678 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367651176184 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.