The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the usage of three different spreads between 1981 to 2007. It compares the consumption of margarine, low fat and reduced spreads, and butter.

Overall, at the beginning margarine was the most utilized spread, while low fat and reduced spreads being the least. However, from 1991 the former was overtaken by the latter. Although butter was not at all used till 1996, it was the most consumed in 2007.

It can be observed from the graph, that margarine utilization was 140 grams in 1981 and increased to 160 grams in 1986. Nevertheless, it experienced a sudden decline by 1991 and from here it consistently fell till 2001 with only around 50 grams.

In the case of low fat and reduced spreads, this was rather fluctuating. The consumption initially dipped from approximately 90 to 80 grams between 1981 and 1986. Later it rose to around 100 grams in 1991 which was almost consistent till 1996.

Butter was introduced in 1996 with the usage of fewer than 20 grams. Nonetheless, it surged drastically to roughly 80 grams in 2001 leaving the other spreads behind. Even though it decreased to 70 grams by 2007, it was still the most consumed spread.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8855721393 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65554225269 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547263681592 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.4467867472 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.5384615385 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4615384615 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138984109591 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584601927103 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594399455591 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943899509221 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513947776851 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.