The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.

Essay topics:

The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.

The line graph gives information about the number of tourists who visited four types of attractions in Edinburgh, between 1980 and 2010.

Overall, it can be observed that the main attraction over the period is represented by the castle, which reached a peak of 45% of the number of tourists in 1995, while the last popular sight is the zoo, which increased by only 10% over the period.

In 1980 the most popular attraction among tourists was the Festival (30%), but it fluctuated slightly over the next 20 years, then remained steady at about 25%. between 1980 and 1995 the castle recorded a sharp increase, from approximately 25% to almost 45%, but after this the percentage fell gradually to almost 31% in 2010. similarly, the Aquarium reached a peak in 1985, increasing dramatically from 20% to almost 35%, then dropped gradually to almost 8% in 2010. The number of tourists who visited the zoo fluctuated slightly between 1980 to 2000, this being followed by an increase of 10% until 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in Edinburgh, between 1980 and 2010. Overall, it can be observed that the mai...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...creased by only 10% over the period. In 1980 the most popular attraction amon...
^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Between
...ars, then remained steady at about 25%. between 1980 and 1995 the castle recorded a sha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...e fell gradually to almost 31% in 2010. similarly, the Aquarium reached a peak in 1985, i...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, similarly, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89411764706 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59037344838 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.6479839923 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186592456467 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10748957509 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129748053055 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175060254016 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151149441624 0.0819641961636 184% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.