Summarize the points made it the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading passage.
The reading posits that bees could have not been existed on earth 200 million years ago due to three main reasons. The speaker, though, debut that the proposed reasons are not implicit and claims that bees could have presented at the time.
Firstly, the reading refutes bees' existence of 200 million years ago as no fossils of them have ever been detected related to that time. However, as the speaker sates, bees might have existed but not preserved. For fossils to be made, certain type pf tree resins are required. Trees producing these specific chemicals had been rare at that time. In other words, bees could have been living at that ancient era but not preserved in fossils due to absence fossilizing agents.
Secondly, the reading asserts that bees and flowering plants have a dependent mutual relationship and bees’ evolution must have relied on flowering plants' existence which did not occur until 125 million years ago. The speaker does not hold such belief and posits that bees could fed on non-flowering plants as pine trees presented at the time and switched to flowering plants upon their evolution.
Lastly, the fossils assumed to be from bee nests might be of structure produced by other animals' activities such beetle’s due to the fact that they lack certain fine structures as spiral caps. The speaker refutes this as she thinks that water proof-substances have been detected from bee fossils of that time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'feed'
Suggestion: feed
... such belief and posits that bees could fed on non-flowering plants as pine trees p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05020920502 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46649791842 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539748953975 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.438332904 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.727272727 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.23603664747 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0318875261492 0.215688989381 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0158605706197 0.103423049105 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0226422659514 0.0843802449381 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0211976979041 0.15604864568 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00913129328914 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.