You recently organized an all day meeting for your company which tool place in a local hotel In their feedback participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel but they were unhappy about the food that was served for lunchWrite a letter to t

Dear Sir or Madam,

This is Shyam, HR manager working with Raytheon Technologies. Our company has organised a full-day meeting at your hotel 'Taj Banjara' on 25th December 2020 and I am writing this letter to pass the feedback we received from our employees. Majority of the attendees loved the facility for being able to provide excellent hygiene. Also, the ambience of the venue is another aspect that made our participants happy.

On the down side, although the offerred facilities met the expectations, there is a huge disappointment regarding the food options and quality. Despite being promised varieties of options, our participants were served only items from North Indian cuisine. On top of it, we received complaints that the food was served cold which is not something we expected from a reputed hotel like yours.

It would be great if you could customise the food packages so that the organisers can choose multiple cuisines before hand. In addition to the options, you might want to consider the storage containers that could keep the dishes warm and fresh. Furthermore, it would be really appreciated if you could enable the buffet option for future events.

I hope this feedback helps you and you will act upon it.

Yours Sincerely,
Shyam

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: DOWN_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'downside'?
Suggestion: downside
... made our participants happy. On the down side, although the offerred facilities met t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: BEFORE_HAND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beforehand'?
Suggestion: beforehand
...organisers can choose multiple cuisines before hand. In addition to the options, you might ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, really, regarding, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 32.9175257732 85% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 26.3917525773 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 937.175257732 113% => OK
No of words: 208.0 206.0 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10096153846 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67735804794 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 127.690721649 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692307692308 0.622605031667 111% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 290.88556701 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.13402061856 99% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6956608248 44.8134815571 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4166666667 76.5299724578 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 16.8248392259 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 4.34317383033 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212527498885 0.216113520407 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619360488148 0.0766984524023 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489780609863 0.0603063233224 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108338555947 0.12726935374 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373210939217 0.0580467560999 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 8.37731958763 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 8.71597938144 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 41.2886597938 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.