Animals are killed and consumed for human needs Some people consider this as cruel However others consider this as mandatory Discuss both views and give your own opinion

In the contemporary era of extensive industrialization, animals are slaughtered for the manufacturing of numerous discrete products. Many of us comprehend this to be undeniable while others, on the contrary, perceive this as an inhuman endeavor. I consider this necessary, as deceased animal constituents were being used as a raw material in production over many years. This essay keenly examines both the ideologies and in furtherance shores up my opinion.

First, let us put a light on the perception which senses this to be essential. It is undebatable that some body parts of the wildlife constitute to a large extent in many industries, where they cannot be substituted in the majority of the cases. Moreover, these products embrace the utmost demand in the market thus, contributing a commendable revenue to the economy. For example, leather made out of tanned skin has been used profusely in the manufacture of various accessories like belts and bags. Thus, they are proven to be precious resources for the industries.

Now, we will hurtle towards the other view. In contrast to the above discussion many others like animal activists demand that animal massacres for money and goods should be brought to a halt. They think that this creates ecological imbalances along with forcing some species on to the verge of extinction. Also, it is insisted that this has been done despite the availability of substitutes to save a mere amount of money. For example, in many countries protests are held against killing these creatures for production purposes.

Summarizing the discussion, Even though there are many supporters of this issue, it experiences some opposition too. Nonetheless, it is obvious that the advantages overshadow the grim influences. Because of this, I stand by the thought that it is okay to use domestic beings in the production houses.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'somebody'?
Suggestion: somebody
...to be essential. It is undebatable that some body parts of the wildlife constitute to a l...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, thus, while, for example, in contrast, in contrast to, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04243141071 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5134712072 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.2941176471 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243744303021 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701660573447 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424222534185 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144019489384 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067189041398 0.056905535591 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.