CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Globalization and technological advancement have allowed a shift in global marketing topics. Multinational corporations who used to be accountable only to their shareholders, now hold responsibilities toward local communities in which they operate, pressured to acknowledge their impacts on the economy, the environment, and all other aspects of society.
Manufacture activities can have detrimental side effects on the environments and stakeholders. Factories not only contribute the lion's share of carbon emission to the cause of global warming, but they are also considered a nuisance by their neighbors. And there are many negative impacts revealed on the ubiquitous world wide web such as Nestle's case of Osceola, in Michigan (USA) in which the company attempted to privatize a public water source, depriving the locals of access to domestic water. It is these kinds of suffering caused by corporations' actions that they shouldmust be aware of whether it was intentional or unintentional.
More than ever, consumers learn to use their purchasing power to boycott companies with bad reputation, and advocate for corporations who have done good deeds for society. While Nestle was shunned upon for causing pollution, using child labor, or manipulating uneducated mothers, Adidas was applauded for taking an action toward solving coastal plastic waste. The company partnered up with an environmental organization called Parley for the Oceans to collect beverage container debris floating on the sea. These plastic bottles were recycled into a special kind of threads that then turned into shoes. This shoe collection was so popular because the current environmentally minded generation of customers specifically sought it. From 2015 when it debuted to 2017, it is estimated that Adidas has sold more than a million pairs of Parley.
In conclusion, multinational organizations by fulfilling their corporate social responsibility of delivering benevolence to their employees, the local communities, and the environment are often considered favorable by public opinions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-24 | honganh15102003 | 89 | view |
| 2020-07-24 | honganh15102003 | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | WritingPra | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | orucovali1@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2018-10-04 | SATPREET SINGH | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orporations actions that they shouldmust be aware of whether it was intentional o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72815533981 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25850596825 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676375404531 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1843963261 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.153846154 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144567982299 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426842255516 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781858324749 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112113469633 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981954115945 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.