Discuss the arguments for and against raising pets.
Concerning the issue of raising pets, some people do support this matter because of its benefits. However, others have opposite ideas. In this writing, both sides of this debate will be analyzed before reaching any conclusion.
From the one side, a plausible argument of supporters is that taking care of pets will bring many benefits to people in many aspects. First of all, it can be said with certainty the pets are believed to have positive effects on the health of the owners. This is surely a positive feature because pets are generally loyal and playful. They help people reduce stress and make them feel relax after tiring day at work. Second of all, a special consideration in this case is that pets bring comfort to the lives of the owners. This is undoubtedly positive since taking care of them may reduce the feeling of isolation and loneliness of owners. Besides, some of them may not fit living in the wild environment. Thus, it would be better to take care of them manually. Last but not least, it is believed that pets are a sounding board. They can be a good listener to listen all share of owners.
From the other side, those who disagree point out that there are a couple of shortcomings. First of all, one of the disadvantages is that pets can carry pathogens. This is a clear limitation because if owners do not take care of them carefully, pathogens will be in their skin. That may affect to health of its and human.
Taking everything into account, for the above reasons, I firmly believe that the benefits of raising pets outweigh its possible dangers. Therefore, I do totally support taking care of pets.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68989547038 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48588629794 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529616724739 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3027940581 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.8421052632 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1052631579 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21052631579 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127918293001 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383194684602 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518108920641 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787191517241 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046819780301 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.33 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.