Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world.Some people think that this cannot be taken to bring about a change.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is a paradigm fact that the detrimental influence have indeed been ascending at an alarming rate by epoch-making progress in almost all fields of human livelihood. A few people believe that this trend cannot be modified. While some social experts remonstrate the former view and consent about inevitable actions should be taken in context of overcoming those impacts. My explanation is chronologically discussed further with validated opinion.
Examining the former view, the primary argument that supporters would put forward is consumerism and modernization. In other words,day-by-day,the people's life can not be fulfilled without the essential things. A good illustration about it is that the all luxurious accessories like shoes,belts and jackets and so on made from the leather. This act eventually extincting some living mammals. Furthermore, the prevailing 'Concrete world' has also affected the natural things. The plants and trees are cutoff to make extra space for necessary amenities such as transportation, hospitalization and construction of skyscrapers for accommodation.
On the contrary, the latter view suggest this trend as an antagonistic aspect and made some effective precautions that are urgently required for saving mortals before it would be jeopardized. In addition to this, the government should impose a strict regulation against these destructive activities. For instance, those people who have a hobby of hunting should be penalized by authorities and also some restrictions are implemented toward the environment in context of rescuing. So that, if present sensation is manifested naturally, it would be realised that the plants and animals play a paramount role in 'Ecological Cycle',wito it the cycle can not be completed.
To recapitulation, it can be concluded that owing to contemporary requirements of human, all the living creatures are affected negatively. And, I opine that to overcome those aftermaths consequences the government should campaign and impose regulations and also people should aware about their self responsibility to save environment things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , day-by-day
...merism and modernization. In other words,day-by-day,the peoples life can not be fulfilled w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...nization. In other words,day-by-day,the peoples life can not be fulfilled without the e...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , belts
...the all luxurious accessories like shoes,belts and jackets and so on made from the lea...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 626, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , wito
...lay a paramount role in Ecological Cycle,wito it the cycle can not be completed. T...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, such as, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72843450479 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38524296896 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619808306709 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8354928374 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0625 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192586244666 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586872476954 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376946538868 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113923105025 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397272697665 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.