Human Activity has negative impact on plant and animals
Activities done by the humans has already damaged our nature. Lot of the species of animals and plants have extincted from man made activities either by hunting of animals or
deforestation, not only that pollution produced by humans on land, in air and water has affect for plants and animals who consume plants. Now lot of people believe that now nothing
could be done to improve this condition, notwithstanding this statement many people think that lot action can make difference. I personally believe that many activities can be
done to nullify these adverse effects to nature.
The people believe in that what we have done is irreversible and cannot be undone. Plastic pollution is one of the classic example of that, as the plastic is not only
highly toxic but is extremely tough to degrade and even after getting degrade it pollute the air and water making breathing for marine life very harmful and ended up killing them.
Similarly, Toxic gases from industries, Green houses, Gases released from vehicles are few aspect that are getting a little out of control. Some Illegal hunting of endangered species
is still happening.
However, there are people they believe that new strict rules and regulation could be introduce by the government for industries responsible for pollution. In supporting this new rules government could start awareness program for the people who are less aware for the environmental problems. And as an individual person we could try to produce minimum
waste and do less wastage of resource. People also could plant trees and maintain them properly.
In conclusion, It is not possible to reverse all the impacts that human has made. But Some steps could be taken to at least normalize the impacts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...by humans on land, in air and water has affect for plants and animals who consume plants. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w lot of people believe that now nothing could be done to improve this condition,...
^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally believe that many activities can be done to nullify these adverse effects to...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y these adverse effects to nature. The people believe in that what we have ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 82, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pollutes'?
Suggestion: pollutes
...grade and even after getting degrade it pollute the air and water making breathing for ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun aspect seems to be countable; consider using: 'few aspects'.
Suggestion: few aspects
...ouses, Gases released from vehicles are few aspect that are getting a little out of contro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me Illegal hunting of endangered species is still happening. Howev...
^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngered species is still happening. However, there are people they believe t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt trees and maintain them properly. In conclusion, It is not possible to rev...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s made. But Some steps could be taken to at least normalize the impacts. ...
^^
Line 16, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n to at least normalize the impacts.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, still, at least, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11846689895 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63846133685 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574912891986 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2314560403 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.928571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.38176352705 228% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 5.01903807615 219% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169735696134 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601096144712 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988528301675 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07175681848 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105522276894 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.