With the wider acceptance of internet and mobile phone had led to decrease in peoples letter writing abilities. In my view letter writing had evolved to a new level with respect to e-mail, so I partly agree with the statement. When it comes to mobile messaging, it’s completely informal and unstructured, it will lead to complete disappearance of letter writing and I completely agree with the claim.
Letter writing was considered to be s complex skill, it was studied as a major topic in many education systems. This has different formats , one for formal and informal method’s of communication. Each of this format has a specific structure and the tone of the language to be followed. Often to attain this skill it’s a time consuming processes. Secondly few people consider letter writing skill to be an art. The reason for such a belief is due to the fact that it challenges the end user to put all his complex toughts into a finite space, as the letter had limited space to write. One instance is the letter written by Albert Einstein to his son about good work had been sold for about ten million dollars.
In the late twenty first century, internet has gained more popularity, this led to wider acceptance of email as am alternative to letter. Here one can say that letter writing had evolved. The reason to say that it had evolved is due to the fact that email had adopted most of the letter structur. It had introduced new fields like subject, this gives the gist of the mail. Secondly, e-mails can be sent immediately to any part in the world and can be read instantaneously. Due to this reason unlike traditional letter, the size of the mail being sent had decreased and they tend to be more specific about the topic.
The evolution of mobile had greatly led to the fall in letter writing skill. This is because the messages sent via mobile are completely informal and there is no standard structure that gives any specific guidelines to follow while sending a message. These messages are called SMS. Its estimated that people around the globe send about 100 billion SMS a day. This popular acceptance of mobile let to dimnishing the need to write letter and effectively the letter writing ability.
So sum up, email’s inherited few of the structures of traditional letter, while the skill of letter writing is at the verge of being lost in the age of mobile phone
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...complex skill, it was studied as a major topic in many education systems. This ha...
^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tion systems. This has different formats , one for formal and informal method&apos...
^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of this format has a specific structure and the tone of the language to be follo...
^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-first
...out ten million dollars. In the late twenty first century, internet has gained more popul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...on dollars. In the late twenty first century, internet has gained more popularity, t...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of being lost in the age of mobile phone
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, while, in my view, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77697841727 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66009344929 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498800959233 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0261960256 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5454545455 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9545454545 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04545454545 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249047002075 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849824713745 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828720853047 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172132191948 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803207730403 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.